Everything QTC is now in one app: Meteor ☄️ With Meteor you can: - Bridge funds from native Quantus L1 to Meteor App - Access QTC’s LP and lending borrowing on Meteor Explore No switching apps. Everything in one place.

ECDSA and EdDSA now have an end date. NIST says they're discouraged after 2030. Disallowed after 2035. Most chains still sign with one of the two. Only ±0.27% of the crypto market cap sits on chains that have already migrated. Follow the progress:

NEW INTEGRATION Aurora Intents is now live on @qlyphsxyz. Bring assets into @QuantusNetwork from other chains, right inside the Qlyphs app and wallet extension. Live quotes. Tracking from deposit to settlement. And back out the same way. Bridge in → trade → bridge out. Powered by @near_intents.

I think Fortune is underestimating it tbh. It’s quite a bit more than $2 trillion at this point. puts it at $2.7 trillion, and even that is an underestimate. Get the details here:

Last week in quantum: @Starknet backed research into becoming an independent post-quantum Layer 1. More than 93.5% of voting power backed the research, across 2,800+ wallets, and StarkWare didn’t vote. It’s research only. Any actual move needs a second vote, and a whitepaper draft is expected in November. Quantum risk entered the insurance conversation. @projecteleven named Relm Insurance a development partner for Strongpoint, its custody product, to explore how post-quantum security could factor into digital asset underwriting. No premium or policy changes have been announced. @QuantinuumQC reported a new error-correction record. Its Helios system reached 99.9995% logical memory fidelity per cycle, about 10 times better than its own September result. That figure measures memory reliability, not a complete computation. The team also demonstrated improving logical gate accuracy, though further work remains to scale all the components needed for universal fault-tolerant computing. Postquant Labs launched the Quip Virtual Machine. The QVM provides a shared programming environment for quantum annealers, gate-based quantum computers, and classical machines, with a maximum cost quoted before execution. It is live on @quipnetwork’s Aglais testnet. Post-quantum readiness increasingly needs evidence. Chains need tested migration plans. Custodians need controls insurers can assess. Quantum hardware needs reliable computation beyond memory benchmarks. The useful question is what each announcement actually demonstrates.

➥ My quantum-resistant token wishlist I’m spending more time on this sector because the migration is already happening. Google targets 2029 for post-quantum readiness, with Google Cloud publishing a detailed migration roadmap in August. That’s a deadline to prepare infra, not a prediction that Bitcoin gets broken in 2029. I believe wallets, custodians and institutions will need to evaluate quantum exposure before a capable quantum computer arrives. But I’m checking what actually protects user funds: native signatures, optional account upgrades, or unfinished implementations. Here’s my wishlist: → base:0x37696cd8f723ce541ac376f79fc109080e505ba3 - the operating history I want to study. Native transactions have used hash-based XMSS signatures since 2018. Next checkpoint is Zond: whether its post-quantum smart-contract stack can attract developers beyond the security thesis. → $QTC - the newer implementation I’m following closely. @QuantusNetwork native ML-DSA transaction signing. I want to see sustained usage, accessible liquidity and demand that can absorb mining emissions. → $CKB - cryptographic flexibility interests me. Its SPHINCS+ Lock Script and Quantum Purse let users adopt post-quantum protection today. It’s optional, so wallet adoption matters as much as protocol capability. → algorand:native - a concrete migration path on an established chain. Native Falcon-1024 accounts are supported. I’m watching wallet and app compatibility. → $NEAR - migration without changing the account address. ML-DSA-65 signing went live in July. Fireblocks demonstrated rotating a funded account in 2 transactions, then receiving and sending funds with the new key. That’s the kind of practical integration I care about. → abelian:native - privacy and post-quantum security together. @PQabelian uses lattice-based cryptography for private transactions. I want to understand whether that translates into recurring payment demand and stronger liquidity. → $CELL - the ability to change algorithms over time. @cellframenet supports multiple post-quantum signature schemes. I’m watching adoption of its native infra, while checking which chain and token representation users actually hold. → $STRK - promising architecture, with dependencies. Hash-based STARK proofs and working Falcon account implementations give Starknet a migration path. Those account implementations remain early-stage, and full protection still depends on Ethereum’s transition. I’m also tracking $ZEC’s quantum-recoverability work. It supports a future migration; it doesn’t make current Zcash fully quantum-resistant. Where I expect growth: → wallets that make key migration usable. → custody systems that can support new signatures. → infra that handles their higher verification costs. → networks that turn those capabilities into retained users and fees. Existing chains can upgrade too, so post-quantum cryptography alone won’t guarantee token demand.

Christopher Smith says Bitcoin should take quantum seriously "If you've got a trillion dollar asset secured by elliptic curves, you might want to be taking it seriously." "Signal, iMessage, Cloudflare, they already went post quantum and just nobody noticed."

There's been a resurgence of coins that I'm labeling '2017-era Bitcoin clones' $PRL +30% this week, $4.2b FDV $QTC + 300% this month, $1.8b @ 21m supply Kind of interesting that 21m hardcapped supply tokens are commanding multi-billion dollar vals