Having Grok Bot redo the same clicks in a web app burns a lot of tokens. One of the best ways I've found to stretch your usage is asking @bot to reverse engineer expensive browser use tasks into scripts! Have it capture the network requests from a computer-use run once. Next time, skip the UI and hit the APIs directly with the same auth. This also has the added benefit of being way faster than having Bot click around in a GUI!

One of the best parts about Grok Bot is how easy it is to add custom connectors. If we're ever missing a connector from our marketplace, you can just tell Bot to add it! This also works for any custom MCPs that you might already be hosting! Now let me look into getting @Plaid added officially ...

Grok @bot is a smash hit It will have 100m users this time next year It’s the ultimate agent onboarding tool for non-technical people @bot will have more users than @x in three years if the X team keeps improving it at this pace

I’ve been using it for ~2 hours and I’m absolutely blown away at how I could automate a bunch of my workflows. Cursor team built a way for “normies” to automate stuff. Feels like an OpenClaw 2.0 moment. (Zero affiliation, I upgraded to Ultra to use it and absolutely worth it.)

SpaceXAI's Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, joining the frontier in line with GPT-5.6 Sol, with standout agentic performance at lower cost Grok 4.6 gains 5 points over Grok 4.5 on the Intelligence Index just over one month after its release, or +23 points compared to Grok 4.3. This brings SpaceXAI back to the intelligence frontier alongside OpenAI, behind only Anthropic. Key takeaways: ➤ Grok 4.6 joins the frontier of the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: It scores 61, in line with GPT-5.6 Sol (max), behind Claude Opus 5 (max, 63) and Claude Fable 5 (max with fallback, 62), and just ahead of Kimi K3 ➤ Strong agentic performance: Grok 4.6 achieves a GDPval-AA v2 Elo of 1753, behind only Claude Opus 5 and with overlapping confidence intervals with Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.8 Max. It scores 50.7% on 𝜏³-Banking, among the top two scores alongside Qwen3.8 Max (51.3%), and 88.4% on Terminal-Bench v2.1, in line with the leading models ➤ Frontier-level intelligence at lower cost: Headline pricing is unchanged from Grok 4.5 at $2/$6 per 1M input/output tokens, 60%+ below Claude Opus 5 ($5/$25) and GPT-5.6 Sol ($5/$30). It cost $0.84 per task, the same as Kimi K3 with slightly higher intelligence, placing it on the Intelligence vs. Cost per Task Pareto frontier ➤ Grok 4.6 sits at Fable 5-tier on AA-Briefcase, our private benchmark of long-horizon agentic knowledge work tasks, with an Elo of 1577 - behind the Claude Opus 5 family. It is notably turn-efficient, completing tasks in ~53 turns and ~0.5B input tokens on average vs. ~103 turns and ~2.0B input tokens for Claude Opus 5 (max) Other model details: ➤ Context window of 500k tokens (unchanged from Grok 4.5) ➤ Pricing of $2/$6 per 1M tokens of input/output; cache hits discounted to $0.5 per 1M tokens, an increase over Grok 4.5’s $0.3 per 1M tokens for cache hits Congratulations to @SpaceXAI and @elonmusk on the release!

This is one of the coolest projects that I’ve worked on. Grok Bot had insane PMF internally, almost instantly. For much of the company, Bots have become the interface for all of their work. Really excited to see what your Bots do!!