I really like this one on @SushiSwap There’s legit only 2 coins with any volume there It’s this and meowshi $CAT makes me lolz and pays in $AAPL which is cool @alexmccurryo still waiting for you to produce a runner sir

Incredibly excited for the launch of @TradePools!! This rollout has been absolutely insane. Degens discovered earlier versions of the smart contracts and traded over $150m in trading volume before the UI even went live This created a unique challenge where we had to update our site and indexing to support both the earlier test versions and the final versions of the contracts at the same time, which added some additional time to the launch People have used uniswap as both a launchpad and launchpad infra for over 8 years. We're excited to be building alongside all the other launchpads to move the space forward What most sets apart? - no added launchpad fee, just the normal protocol fee that comes with all v4 pools. This makes the launch pool way better for traders, with total spreads far lower than most launchpads - autocompounding liquidity (excited to bring this feature to normal Uniswap LPing as well) - permanently locked liquidity for all launches - two launch methods: instant launch works similar to other launchpads, and crowd launch simplifies what we built with CCA to create a fairer, more bundle resistant launch method - deep integrations and distribution: Pools has day one support across uniswap web app, wallet, trading api, all third party trading api integrations, bitget, fomo, gmgn, okx wallet, etc, with more coming online rapidly Have seen various takes claiming incorrect fee splits - to be clear the 0.25% LP fees autocompounds to the locked liquidity pool, it does not go to the uniswap team. This becomes 20% to the creator and 80% to the liquidity compounding mechanism Uniswap Labs team has been cooking hard on this one but its still in beta. We intend to ship a constant stream of upgrades and improvements from here. So please share any feedback!!

here is my hypotheses on new @bankrbot x @SushiSwap launchpad is their solution as an answer to @TradePools currently, bankr use @dopplerprotocol and @Uniswap v4 as its infra under the hood. when ethereum:0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 decided to make their own launchpad - they literally vampired users and liquidity from 67 launchpads who used uniswap's rails. which @0xDeployer didnt like He found a kindred spirit in @alexmccurryo who is uniswap's competitor and told that frogs are lame so you are here at pools[.]fun teaser. my working theory: poolsfun moves bankr's existing robinhood launch flow from doppler/uniswap v4 to sushi launch and sushi v3. bankr keeps the distribution layer: > launch a token through a message on x > launch through the bankr agent, api or cli > managed wallets and transaction execution > metadata and social links > creator fee claims and recipient routing > treasury automation > glidepath for gradual creator selling sushi becomes the execution and liquidity layer: > immediate sushi v3 market > permanently locked lp position > launches against weth, usdg and tokenized stocks like tsla, nvda, gme and aapl > a simpler fixed launch recipe targeting roughly $5k initial fdv pros and cons? > the current bankr/doppler stack charges 1.75% all-in per trade > the current sushi launch pool charges 1% that is roughly 43% less fee friction for traders. it also gives bankr a dex partner that is less likely to take over the frontend, user relationship and launch distribution itself but a straight backend swap has serious downsides - under bankr's current doppler economics, 0.95% of volume works for the creator side: > 0.665% claimable creator fees > 0.285% compounded into locked liquidity under the existing sushi launch economics: > the creator gets 0.70% > sushi gets 0.30% > and sushi also reserves 3% of every token supply for one year on $1m volume: > current bankr creator side: $9,500 > current sushi creator fees: $7,000 the existing bankr stack also has a 0.475% bankr protocol fee and a 0.2375% bnkr buyback. neither exists in the current sushi factory sushi v3 is also less programmable than the v4 hook stack. bankr's quote-only fees, custom fee routing and bnkr buyback do not automatically survive the move. and sushi launch is not a fair-launch upgrade the creator can still launch and buy the virgin pool atomically before anyone else. there is no auction, anti-sniper window or crowd price discovery so just replacing uniswap v4 with sushi v3 would be cheaper for traders, but worse for creators and economically pointless for bankr for pools[.]fun to make sense, something else probably has to ship: > a bankr-specific fee split or router > an offchain revenue agreement with sushi > bnkr buybacks funded from the sushi side > bankr treasury automation around creator fees > or a much stronger consumer product that makes up for lower fee capture with far more launches and volume so base:0x22af33fe49fd1fa80c7149773dde5890d3c76f3b trying to own the launchpad distribution while base:0x7d49a065d17d6d4a55dc13649901fdbb98b2afba supplies the markets. we still need the actual reveal to know the fee split and whether bankr built a new router but that is the version that makes the teaser make sense get rich or die tryin'