We are putting a new foundation under legal research in @WeareLegora. Comprehensive data, a full ontology of law, and an AI-native citator. Almost every legal question starts in the same place. What does the law say, and does it still hold. That is also where AI has been least worth trusting, and I think it is the hardest problem in legal AI. Two things have to be true: You have to have the law, and you have to know your way around it. Getting the data is a grind, and a different grind in every country. We partner with publishers where we can. Where nobody will partner, we go and get it ourselves. Manual requests, physical scanning, whatever that jurisdiction takes. We are working through over 100 countries and every type of source. Then the harder half. No agent can reason across hundreds of millions of documents. Something has to choose the sources before the reasoning starts. So we are building an ontology of the law and an AI native citator, compressing corpora of thousands to hundreds of millions of documents into structured data that an agent actually can use to provide reliable output. The publishers did this by hand. 150 years, thousands of attorney editors, every opinion read by a person. We have hired the best of those editors. They set the standard and they call the close ones, but AI does the muscle work. Reading 60 million pages of case law is no longer too expensive to attempt. The ontology is in limited beta now. Generally available in Q4. Full story:

Every journalist asks me a version of the same question. Will AI mean fewer lawyers? Our customers are hiring more of them. Put complexity of the task on one axis and volume on the other. Low-complexity, high-volume work moves to agents, and that pushes the pyramid up. More of the hard work gets done, because someone finally has the capacity to do it. Then there is demand. When something gets faster and better, the world asks for more of it. Jevons noticed it in 1865. Better steam engines made Britain burn far more coal. That was coal, not law, but the mechanism is the same. More M&A, more disputes, more regulatory work, more companies being started. The pie is growing. An independent study interviewed 30 firms across the AmLaw 200, Magic Circle and top international firms. 42% said Legora has helped them win new work, directly or indirectly. 45% said the same about expanding relationships with clients they already had. 39% have taken on matters that would previously have needed more people, more time, or a no. One firm in that study went through a corporate client's entire technology supply chain, every contract, to work out what they were paying and where. A human team would have needed weeks and the cost would have killed the project before it started. With Legora it took four to five days. Their own summary: it was work that we would not have done in the past. The work was not economical before, so nobody did it and nobody billed for it. Now it gets done, and someone has to do it.