"The Kennedy Exception Kennedy runs HHS. Has loyalty replaced scrutiny?" The essay linked below is one of one oor most critical and powerful pieces regarding what has happened at HHS, please read the full essay before commenting. Quoting from the essay: "The medical freedom movement spent five years telling Americans that friendship, credentials, reputation, and institutional prestige were irrelevant. Follow the evidence. Question authority. Demand transparency. Hold powerful people accountable. Fine. Then do it. Ask Robert F. Kennedy Jr. why the COVID mRNA vaccines are still on the market. Ask whether he still believes they should be removed. Ask whether he still believes the COVID vaccine was the “deadliest vaccine ever made.” Ask why NIH continues funding mRNA vaccine research. Ask why his department approved an mRNA influenza vaccine after he publicly said mRNA vaccines fail against respiratory viruses such as influenza. Ask why the COVID PREP Act liability shield remains intact when Kennedy publicly supported ending that protection before taking office and now possesses the authority to amend the declaration prospectively himself. Ask what happened to Prasad, Makary, and Høeg. Ask what Kennedy did to protect the people inside FDA who were actually willing to confront these issues. Ask why Prasad’s refusal to review Moderna’s mRNA flu vaccine was reversed after White House intervention, only for Prasad to leave and the vaccine to be approved months later. Ask what role Kennedy played in the decision to replace Makary. Ask why Høeg was fired, and whether Kennedy supported or opposed that decision. Ask why Kennedy is now praising nominees with long records of supporting vaccines, including mRNA COVID vaccination. And ask what happened in February..."

I disagree. The HHS Secretary could do his job and demand the release of the information to the ACIP or he could choose to go along with the narrative that he has absolutely no power as head of HHS what-so-ever.

While we are at it, Let's look at the role Peter Marks played in all of this fraud. He personally lied to me early in 2021 - claiming clinical trial data that didn't exist, he claimed that this data documenting that the jabs were "safe and effective" He personally told me to just be quiet, that the data would be released shortly - to pull my punches in speaking out. There was no data and luckily, my spidey sense said he was not being truthful, so after a couple of weeks waiting, I then continued speaking out. The head of FDA's CBER lied to me - to silence my criticisms of the regulatory and safety data. After he left the FDA, Peter Marks became head of infectious disease and senior vice president of molecule discovery at Eli Lilly. To be clear, Dr. Marks is hematologist and oncologist - he is not a researcher in virology or an immunologist. But the regulatory capture revolving door helps those who help big pharma.

Senator Cassidy will be gone soon. It is worth taking a moment to reviewing his clear conflicts of interest involving the mRNA vaccine lobby. Let’s hope that his history shows how MAHA can hold politicians accountable for who they choose to get in bed with.

Google's advocacy news today is is trying to get Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana re-elected. Even Fox News story has a "positive" re-election story - supporting Cassidy. Why would this story rise to the headline news? Most likely this is pay-for-play. This is big pharma meddling in MSM again. Yes, they pay MSM big $$$ to run advocacy pieces - written by pharma ghost writers. The man has been a disaster. He has opposed MAHA at every turn, voted for Trump's impeachment and done very little positive for Louisiana. It is only because Louisiana had a jungle primary and democrats could vote for him, that he got elected to the Senate in the first place. Gov. Landry got rid of that nonsense. Now only Republicans can vote in the Republican primary. Cassidy is a RINO - who supports democrats more often than not. His votes in the Senate often support democrats on institutional, health-care, and bipartisan governance issues. Woke issues. He needs to be voted out of office. Julia Letlow is now polling way ahead of Cassidy. She is not a perfect solution, but she is way better than Cassidy. She needs our support.

I just sent a letter to @CIADirector asking him to personally review CIA whistleblower Jim Erdman’s written testimony from yesterday’s hearing. The CIA is on formal notice: there must be no retaliation against him for complying with a Senate subpoena.

Two Republican lawmakers visited CIA headquarters Thursday to investigate the agency's removal last year of 40 boxes of files related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the spy agency's MKUltra program that were being processed for release to the public.