there are people who see this and admire the sheer absurdity of human ambition
and others whose first instinct is to go "what's the point?", "it's not really flying", "it's unviable" etc
let's create a country with the former
Show more
Turns out the future does have flying cars
this type of shitposting announcement makes me way more bullish on
@MistralAI than any specs/tech capabilities
no “proud to announce”, no benchmark chart, no “AI sovereignty” or other buzzword, just a French sporting comeback meme
just wait for Europeans leveling up their marketing
Show more
idk man. Fact is all (current) tier-1 cities are outside of this Mediterranean zone, probably for a reason
yes Madrid and Lisbon are nice, but don’t see them competing with the likes of NYC, Paris, London or Tokyo anytime soon in terms of appeal for the ultra wealthy (except for tax reasons or short stints)
Even from a QoL perspective, almost none of the happiest countries / cities are in this Mediterranean zone. Those rankings are rather dominated by Switzerland, Denmark, Netherlands, New Zealand etc
Show more
once ASI is here and living somewhere because of "work" becomes pointless, people with money will just move to the nicest places on earth
Mediterranean climate, ocean, mountains, good food, beautiful isolated towns
places like this are going to become insanely valuable
probably worth buying real estate there now
Show more
Top 5 cities in the world:
1. Notting Hill
2. Hampstead
3. Shoreditch
4. NYC
5. Tokyo
New York City was just ranked the best city in the world.
Yes AGI will push global city real estate even higher, and especially prime neighbourhoods (West Village, Notting Hill, Soho, Paris intramuros etc)
People thought WFH would kill expensive cities because you could finally "work from anywhere"
But that removes the constraint, not the preference
Millions of people who used to be tied to wherever their job happened to be can increasingly choose where they actually want to live, and turns out a lot of them want the same few neighbourhoods with beautiful streets, cafes, parks, good gyms, restaurants, friends nearby, attractive people, random things happening all the time
A rich Korean, Romanian, Peruvian, etc is no longer forced to live where his employer happens to be, now they can all bid for the same 20 neighbourhoods on earth
Also don't think the future elite becomes less online at all, if anything the opposite
You spend 10 hours online making money / consuming information / talking to people on the other side of the world, of course you're going to pay even more to make the few hours where you close the laptop actually fucking good
Show more
Technology like this makes me even more bullish on tier 1 global city real estate.
The internet is about to be ABSOLUTELY NUKED by all this AI garbage on the internet, including realistic rendered AI companions that sadly a lot of lonely and isolated people will become addicted too.
There's going to be a huge counterelite movement against being terminally online, against spending all this time around this fake bot world,
so the demand to live in the best and most central neighborhoods in the biggest and best cities on the planet? They're going to SOAR.
Places like Central Tokyo, Bangkok, Manhattan + Brooklyn, Zone 1/2 London, Paris's best Arrondissements,
they're all going to feel like charged up fun and hot college campuses. The premium to be there will be even HIGHER.
The 2030s will probably be the most fun decade to ever be in a city.
Show more
Lol yh if money is not a constraint then it’s 100% rational
You’re buying 2 years in NYC, a new friend group, intellectual stimulation, a socially acceptable reason to live there, and some identity/status on top (+ potentially a visa)
Maybe cynical but for some people education is just like travel or art
Although if you have true generational wealth the true test of agency is realising you don’t even need the institutional wrapper. just move to nyc and do whatever you wanted to do anyway
Show more
the other day a friend asked me why i don’t plan my tweets given my demanding PE job, like prepare 4-5 over the weekend then schedule one for 6pm every day of the week
i know this would be optimal for both my time and engagement but idk somehow i just like posting my random thoughts straight away without overthinking it
half the fun of twitter for me is seeing some random thing, having a thought, posting it 3min later, then changing my mind because some guy with 400 followers replied sth smarter
so instead i write most of them on the go or after a packed day and sometimes post the best thing i wrote all week at 1:30am just because that’s when i thought of it
the good thing is twitter is one of the few platforms that actually rewards genuine spontaneity and roughness
still leaving a lot of engagement on the table but it keeps the whole thing fun and enjoyable for me, and probably what will keep me posting in the long run
Show more
You don’t get extra agency points for living in a tier-3 city vs nyc/london where you’d have 100x more surface area for luck
A lot of people confuse agency with merit / suffering. feels like a very protestant US / western instinct to turn unnecessary friction into moral credit
High agency is almost the opposite imo: figuring out which constraints are actually fixed and which ones you can just delete from your life (bad city, bad boss, stupid commute, wrong industry) instead of getting insanely good at tolerating them
Show more
interesting perspective but there’s nothing high-agency about choosing hard mode for its own sake
you move to nyc/london cuz you understand your environment is leverage
you don’t prove agency by refusing leverage
Show more
No one should idolise these people then complain about how rich they are
no one should have this amount of wealth
interesting perspective but there’s nothing high-agency about choosing hard mode for its own sake
you move to nyc/london cuz you understand your environment is leverage
you don’t prove agency by refusing leverage
Show more
last outdoor sunday office before the london winter arc
Very bullish on “high agency influencers”. Not purely lifestyle or business or whatever niche, but some guy who keeps moving from one obsession to another with a lot of intentionality + taste. Build a company, move countries, train for hyrox, spend 2 months obsessing over some random niche, etc.
Distribution makes being this kind of person way more viable. Before, every time you switched games you were basically starting from zero again. Now the audience comes with you, & the new obsession itself creates content, inbound, sponsors, business ideas, ppl to meet etc. You can almost make curiosity pay for itself.
& i think there’s a real demand for this too cuz ambitious ppl now have like 100 plausible lives / games they could play and obviously can’t test all of them. These guys basically test different possible lives for you in public.
You don’t even need them to be the best in the world at any one thing. The interesting part is watching someone with enough taste + agency pick a game, take it weirdly seriously, figure it out, then eventually drop it and move onto the next one.
Show more
Marc basically pivoted from indie hacking to being a “high agency influencer”, right in time for AGI.
His moat is not being the best coder / most technical guy in the room, but rather jumping from "coups" to "coups", leveraging his deeply attaching personality. You always want to see what he is up to next. Not only as an influencer doing stupid things for attention, but as a high agency guy who would research some random thing deeply and build sth around it, pursue a weird obsession for 2 months, move to a new city and explain all the pros & cons, get into HYROX and turn that into a $100k sponsorship stunt etc.
His personality is also perfectly suited for that game. He's successful enough / good looking enough / fit enough / makes enough money that the life is clearly aspirational, but never so polished or impressive that you stop relating to him. He's still filming random stuff on his phone, making stupid jokes, talking openly about the 30 things that failed, willing to embarrass himself a bit, doesn't act like he's above anyone.
That's a much more powerful balance than it looks, cause you want someone doing things slightly ahead of you, not someone living in a completely different universe.
If you're some ambitious / high agency 20-sth, Marc is a much more compelling guy to follow than a world class athlete, billionaire or hyper-specialised expert you can admire but never really imagine becoming, or some brainrot lifestyle influencer whose life is entertaining but gives you basically nothing to copy.
With Marc most of the entertainment is watching someone do things you could theoretically do yourself, just with more agency, more speed and less concern for looking stupid.
And I increasingly think that's the bundle that will win post AGI.
Being the most technically competent person in the room matters less when coding / writing / research / design etc. keeps getting cheaper and commoditised. The scarce bundle shifts more toward agency + taste + personality + distribution: knowing what is worth doing, actually doing it, making people care, then carrying that attention into whatever game you decide to play next.
Show more
This is only true for a very slim subset of people chasing exceptional, compressed, power-law outcomes (build a unicorn in 5yr, become globally famous, change an industry, etc.)
For most people, realistic goals + boring linear inputs compounded for 10-20yr is the better strategy to "succeed" (and healthier one). Become great at a job, get wealthy, stay fit, build a good family/life, become genuinely knowledgeable at sth.
Delusion is also one of the straightest paths to permanent dissatisfaction and misery, and why we shouldn't oversell it to the new generation. Sure Steve Jobs / Elon Musk believed impossible things and set crazy targets, but they were (1) extreme exceptions, and (2) had a ridiculous combination of taste, talent density, capital, market timing, organizational ability, distribution, technical teams, etc. Delusion without all of that is usually just delusion.
Show more
I increasingly follow people like this. Not necessarily top 0.1% in their domain, but guys who build / do cool shit, document the process, successes / failures, random discovery of the day, rabbit hole they fell into, city they moved to, sport they suddenly got obsessed with, weird product they bought, interesting people they met, etc.
Basically people whose default response to curiosity is to actually do sth about it.
Show more
Marc basically pivoted from indie hacking to being a “high agency influencer”, right in time for AGI.
His moat is not being the best coder / most technical guy in the room, but rather jumping from "coups" to "coups", leveraging his deeply attaching personality. You always want to see what he is up to next. Not only as an influencer doing stupid things for attention, but as a high agency guy who would research some random thing deeply and build sth around it, pursue a weird obsession for 2 months, move to a new city and explain all the pros & cons, get into HYROX and turn that into a $100k sponsorship stunt etc.
His personality is also perfectly suited for that game. He's successful enough / good looking enough / fit enough / makes enough money that the life is clearly aspirational, but never so polished or impressive that you stop relating to him. He's still filming random stuff on his phone, making stupid jokes, talking openly about the 30 things that failed, willing to embarrass himself a bit, doesn't act like he's above anyone.
That's a much more powerful balance than it looks, cause you want someone doing things slightly ahead of you, not someone living in a completely different universe.
If you're some ambitious / high agency 20-sth, Marc is a much more compelling guy to follow than a world class athlete, billionaire or hyper-specialised expert you can admire but never really imagine becoming, or some brainrot lifestyle influencer whose life is entertaining but gives you basically nothing to copy.
With Marc most of the entertainment is watching someone do things you could theoretically do yourself, just with more agency, more speed and less concern for looking stupid.
And I increasingly think that's the bundle that will win post AGI.
Being the most technically competent person in the room matters less when coding / writing / research / design etc. keeps getting cheaper and commoditised. The scarce bundle shifts more toward agency + taste + personality + distribution: knowing what is worth doing, actually doing it, making people care, then carrying that attention into whatever game you decide to play next.
Show more
That's what being a post-money founder looks like.
You stop optimising for money but instead focus on scale / relevance / cultural influence (and maybe eventually status/power).
And weirdly that can make the underlying thing much bigger. Cause you become your own VC, making asymmetric bets with your accumulated capital: you can kill the paywall, maximise network growth and figure monetisation out later.
The big advantage of succeeding with cash-generative businesses (like Peter did) is eventually having enough money to make those venture-style bets yourself, while still keeping 100% of the company (no dilution, no external investors, all the upside still yours if it works).
IMO that's one of the most underrated things money buys ambitious founders. Not retirement, but the ability to build things that don't need to make money immediately.
Show more
🎒After a decade, I have made free for everyone now!
Well almost free, it's $1 to sign up to avoid getting lots of spam
The reason is
1) I have made enough money (from it)
2) charging for a community artificially limits the size, if you put the price at $299 you get 50 new members per month, at $99 you get 200 people, at $29 you get 400 people, etc.
And this always annoyed me, I don't want to put a limit but I had to, to be able to make money from it, so it's free now
I want it to be it the biggest community for digital nomads, world travelers, sovereign thinkers and network state type people
For years it has has a great sponsor with
@SafetyWing and I think that's maybe a better model for the future, get much more people in and then just add more sponsors
Right now for the record it has 43,252 paid members (so about 300/mo for 12 years!), so it will be interesting to see what it can grow too
I think now that AGI is on the horizon (or some say already here), online and offline (IRL) communities will become really important. People are talking more to AI now than to humans, and there was already a loneliness epidemic before AI
Making new friends and dating is not so easy for people now. And with remote work and entrepreneurship, people lack a space like an office where people would usually make friends or meet partners
I made most of the friends I have now through traveling and living around the world for the last 10+ years (and many via my site too), and I also met my girlfriend through those friends! So I think communities can have a real role in that post-AGI
Post-AGI business wise, communities also have a moat where many of my SaaS apps do not. So there is some urgency I feel to make Nomads in to the best community there is for those people. But that's why I have to remove any limitations to its growth now
So in a way after 12 years I am switching to the subsidized VC model a bit, but still 100% bootstrapped, kinda like "You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain"
Having enough money now I can afford to do these things and figure out the business model later, which I think will be more sponsors
Enjoy and please sign up and tell me what to improve!!! 😊
Show more
A good question to ask yourself is "what would happen this year if you were both the luckiest and best person in the world at what you do"
A friend asked me this and it hit, cause as much as i like my private equity job, well, even if i originate a deal myself, work twice as much as my colleagues, and it ends up making my fund $20M, well my total comp for the year will just be +$50k
Sure it's not bad and i'm already extremely lucky with what i earn etc, but when you're a really ambitious guy there is sth mentally draining about knowing that even if you're insanely good, get insanely lucky and basically everything goes your way, nothing THAT crazy can actually happen to you
Cause you can't dream. You don't really have this little thing in the back of your head going "what if this year?" "what if this week?" "what if this goes well?"
It's why i just love this twitter game. I can spend 30 mins writing sth, worst case it gets 8 likes and i forget about it, but there is always this tiny chance i wake up and it did 2m views, some random insane person dm'd me, i meet someone interesting, get pulled into a business opportunity, whatever
And then i can just take another shot tomorrow. then another one the day after
Not saying everyone should become a founder / creator either, obviously the reason jobs like mine are so good is you get a pretty absurd floor and barely any downside
But increasingly think very ambitious people need at least one thing in their life where, if they get exceptionally good + exceptionally lucky, something genuinely disproportionate can happen to them
Show more
always amazes me how much people underspend on day-to-day convenience / comfort
remember an ex investment banker colleague who’d happily spend $200 on dinners & clothes but always complained about his awful landlord mattress ruining his sleep
same thing with no AC, uncomfortable shoes, shit headphones, dead phone battery, moving the same charger around etc. each annoyance feels tiny in isolation so somehow paying to permanently remove it feels expensive
probably one of the easiest lifestyle upgrades once you make decent money is just finding everything that makes a normal day 2-5% worse and paying to remove it
Show more
my rule of thumb for buying anything is simple. if i use it at least twice a day, i buy the best version i can reasonably afford.
e.g. the best toothbrush, the best sheets, the best shoes, the best chair, the best headphones, the best phone, etc.
maybe more specifically the formula is something like frequency x duration x intimacy with your body/attention. if it touches you, supports you, or mediates reality for hours every day, buy the best version you can afford.
this also applies to product development, you should build products that touch ppl’s lives at least twice a day (when i was at g larry page would often say this rule a lot at tgif).
Show more
Dubai hate mostly comes from Europeans with no geographic mobility convincing themselves those who have it are scammers / cheaters. And leftists enraged that some people might opt out of the “unrivalled” European social contract
Surprisingly Dubai is one of the few places where you'd meet more people who love their city than hate it
Personally been there a couple of times and think it's one of the best places pre high wealth, especially for 20-30yo internet entrepreneurs who just want to focus in an extremely efficient / safe environment
Show more
I think the hate for Dubai is mostly a Eurocope that can't deal with how dirty and unsafe Europe's cities have become in the last 10 years
"Dubai doesn't have culture!!!!!!"
True but at least it's safe and clean
Show more
Very true, NYC (like London) makes ordinary work feel important, while SF makes important work feel ordinary
It’s why elite grads in NYC/London still choose banking/consulting/law over startups
They don’t choose careers purely for money, impact or intellectual interest, but mostly for the social signals that come with them
Show more
one of the strangest things about moving from new york to sf was realizing how often extremely important things happen here in settings that don't feel important at all
i lived in new york for four years. i sometimes spent entire days moving icons around in powerpoint, but i was doing it in a skyscraper with great views, surrounded by attractive people in patagonia vests. afterward i'd walk onto a packed street and go to a beautiful restaurant
even when the work itself was mundane, everything around it told you it mattered
sf is almost the opposite
the blue bottle in south park feels like a normal coffee shop. it is also a place where an absurd amount of capital gets allocated
sand hill road is one of the most powerful financial centers in the world and looks like a collection of dentist offices
you'll meet someone dressed like they just rolled out of bed who can't make eye contact and discover later that they control billions of dollars or have built a product you use every day
i've been to parties where almost everyone had raised millions of dollars or built products used by millions of people. in another city, each person would have seemed like a big deal. in sf, they were just standing around a cramped apartment at a "party" that honestly wasn't even that good
i used to live in a closet in a slightly dilapidated hacker house with creaky floors and old furniture. people who lived there went on to create companies worth tens of billions of dollars
new york puts a lot of effort into making importance visible. sf often seems actively uninterested in doing that
some of this is probably because sf is more focused on creation than consumption. some of it is the personality of builders, who often care much more about the thing they're making than the room they're making it in
but i think the lack of polish also lowers the barrier to entry. you don't need to look important before doing something important here
new york makes ordinary work feel important
sf makes important work feel ordinary
Show more